The 2026 Formulation 1 season has not even begun but, and the FIA, led on the technical aspect by Nikolas Tombazis, is already going through a very delicate concern. The facility unit case linked to compression ratios may generate clear aggressive disadvantages and potential disputes with the groups. The ADO (Further Growth Alternative) mechanism could possibly be triggered instantly, successfully confirming a regulatory framework that will already include its first vital gray space.
FIA: a really complicated relationship to handle with Formulation 1 groups
Originally of his expertise with the Worldwide Federation, Nikolas Tombazis centered virtually solely on the technical aspect of the game, dedicating himself to drafting the laws and overseeing their right utility by the groups. Confronted with the large variety of engineers employed by the Formulation 1 groups, Nikolas Tombazis may depend on a comparatively small group throughout the FIA, making each verification course of an especially demanding problem.
For that reason, the previous Ferrari engineer brazenly admits how troublesome it was to repeatedly enhance each himself and the methodologies used to make sure the vehicles’ compliance. Dialogue with the groups relating to regulatory adjustments was notably delicate. Each celebration, whereas formally pursuing the nice of the game, inevitably additionally sought to maximise the pursuits of its personal workforce.
The angle was due to this fact twofold: on one hand, the profit for Formulation 1 as an entire; on the opposite, the aggressive benefit for a selected workforce. Over time, Nikolas Tombazis discovered how you can decode these two layers of analysis, totally conscious that each technical or sporting request at all times carried a strategic part aimed toward gaining an edge over rivals.
FIA: Nikolas Tombazis’ legislative strategy to Formulation 1 is troublesome on a number of ranges
After years of expertise, the Greek engineer has developed a pointy sense of realism. Because of this, choices and interactions at all times depart a posh aftertaste: the stress generated by obligations and conflicting pursuits makes the job extraordinarily demanding, however on the identical time intellectually stimulating from a technical, human and political standpoint.
Inside a Formulation 1 workforce, stress is immediately linked to on-track outcomes, whereas on the FIA, errors are inevitably uncovered to public scrutiny. Each error turns into a topic of criticism, and the technical director naturally turns into the principle goal. For that reason, Nikolas Tombazis highlights that the accountability of making certain equity and technical integrity is simply as heavy throughout the Worldwide Federation.
Each resolution should stability strictness with sensitivity, totally conscious that technical interventions have a profound impression on the way forward for the championship and on aggressive stability between groups. His expertise reveals that even in a regulatory setting, management requires equilibrium between firmness and pragmatism, the power to evaluate dangers and alternatives, and the ability to mediate between collective wants and particular person pursuits.
The unwritten rule the Worldwide Federation ought to apply
An excerpt from an interview given by Nikolas Tombazis to Motorsport Journal completely illustrates how troublesome and problematic it’s to fulfill the groups, particularly when coping with mid-season adjustments or, as is going on now on the daybreak of a brand new regulatory period, with groups working on the very fringe of the laws and exploiting gray areas.
The Mercedes case is emblematic, with Purple Bull additionally seemingly concerned. The reference is to the alarm raised over Ferrari energy items which, identical to these of Audi and Honda, may endure if the best compression ratio resolution had been to be confirmed. There is no such thing as a doubt concerning the integrity of the Worldwide Federation, however the chance that it may discover itself with restricted room for manoeuvre within the face of doubtless worrying conditions is a real concern.
To present an instance: suspending the elimination of a confirmed irregularity to the next season, as a result of it violates the spirit of the rule whereas exploiting a authorized loophole, successfully creates double harm. On one hand, it preserves the aggressive benefit; on the opposite, even figuring out that the answer can be banned the next 12 months, it forces all groups to copy it to be able to keep away from struggling a serious drawback for a complete season.
The DAS case may be accepted, provided that the benefit was comparatively restricted. However gaining an additional 15 horsepower all through your complete championship, together with higher effectivity in managing battery recharge — which from 2026 can even happen in corners by means of using the inner combustion engine — would characterize a very distorting situation. For that reason, the FIA ought to, no matter circumstances, ban such conditions by interesting to frequent sense.
The FIA due to this fact finds itself in a race in opposition to time to shut these technical loopholes earlier than they outline the subsequent period of Formulation 1. The problem for Nikolas Tombazis and his workforce isn’t just about writing guidelines, however about making certain that the spirit of competitors isn’t sacrificed on the altar of intelligent engineering. If the governing physique fails to behave decisively now, they danger a lopsided championship the place the winners are determined within the courtroom and the design workplace relatively than on the asphalt of the world’s biggest circuits.
Dec 31, 2025
Let different Scuderia Followers learn about us
