Welcome to Thursday’s version of the RaceFans round-up.
Remark of the day
The FIA has lastly heeded calls to extend the variety of Method 1 superlicence factors it awards to Method 2 drivers, however is the system mandatory within the first place?
Given how few individuals make it to F1 or are in severe consideration for a seat, this complete factors enterprise is needlessly sophisticated and will most likely simply be scrapped. I get why it’s the method it’s, and in that context it’s okay-ish, however simply return to giving provisional licenses the form of which labored completely high-quality for Raikkonen in 2001. If the drivers aren’t prepared and act like a idiot, revoke the license. Depart it to the groups in the event that they need to take a threat on somebody. There are many provisions within the Code to penalize and even ban somebody who isn’t as much as the job.
Take a look at the grid now, and see how nicely Antonelli, Hadjar and others have achieved, and the system turns into much more foolish. The FIA would argue; see, the factors work. However you even have guys like Lawson, Latifi and Mazepin getting 40 factors. The system ensures nothing in regards to the rookies, however by artificially limiting the choices, it promotes having mediocre drivers like Ocon, Hülkenberg, Gasly, and now even former rejects Bottas and Pérez on the grid repeatedly and once more… however why? So we are able to see for the tenth season that they’re simply okay however nothing particular?MichaelN
















